More Proof that Really Smart People Can Be Really Stupid

You may have heard about the (some think) racist email from a third year Harvard Law student. You can read the (nearly) full email here. But this quote gives the gist of the student’s argument:

I absolutely do not rule out the possibility that African Americans are, on average, genetically predisposed to be less intelligent. I could also obviously be convinced that by controlling for the right variables, we would see that they are, in fact, as intelligent as white people under the same circumstances. The fact is, some things are genetic. African Americans tend to have darker skin. Irish people are more likely to have red hair. (Now on to the more controversial:) Women tend to perform less well in math due at least in part to prenatal levels of testosterone, which also account for variations in mathematics performance within genders. This suggests to me that some part of intelligence is genetic, just like identical twins raised apart tend to have very similar IQs and just like I think my babies will be geniuses and beautiful individuals whether I raise them or give them to an orphanage in Nigeria. I don’t think it is that controversial of an opinion to say I think it is at least possible that African Americans are less intelligent on a genetic level, and I didn’t mean to shy away from that opinion at dinner.

Why doesn’t she say she thinks it is possible that African Americans are MORE intelligent on a genetic level? By her argument, we don’t know the facts so this could be just as true. (Is she revealing a racist bias?) I also found it amusing that she thinks her babies will be “geniuses and beautiful individuals” whether raised by her or in a Nigerian orphanage. Typical Harvard student, thinks she’s a genius — and that her kids will be too! We know her kids would be very different individuals under those scenarios regardless of their genetics. Personally, I think I would like the Nigerian version of her children more. I also call bullshit on the idea that “prenatal levels of testosterone” have anything to do with gender and math scores, whatever “scientific” study she is talking about there.

She sums up:

In conclusion, I think it is bad science to disagree with a conclusion in your heart, and then try (unsuccessfully, so far at least) to find data that will confirm what you want to be true. Everyone wants someone to take 100 white infants and 100 African American ones and raise them in Disney utopia and prove once and for all that we are all equal on every dimension, or at least the really important ones like intelligence. I am merely not 100% convinced that this is the case.

I agree with her first sentence. But look at how she frames it. Isn’t it just as bad science to pursue the opposite conclusion in the absence of evidence, that innate intelligences are unequal? Recall how she cited the prenatal study. Is she reaching for data that will confirm what she wants to be true?

Since we cannot do the 100/100 experiment, we will likely never know the answer to this debate. But we can go with common sense. And common sense tells me there are 100 different kinds of intelligent in this world. One kind gets you into Harvard Law school. Another kind knows the futility of engaging in this argument unless you are a racist.

In her defense, she just considered it an intellectual discussion between her and two other friends. It’s not like this was an op-ed piece she wrote. And I’m sure everyone has a few emails they wish they could take back. The Harvard Law student who sent the email said this in her apology to the Black Student Law Association: “I emphatically do not believe that African Americans are genetically inferior in any way. I understand why my words expressing even a doubt in that regard were and are offensive.”

  1. Miguel’s avatar

    (Reluctantly – for fear of righteous wrath):

    North American native peoples have more trouble digesting certain complex carbohydrates – leading to a statistically significant higher level of diabetics and renal problems. (This is not learned behavior). The same holds true for alcohol. Saying this is not social darwinism.

    The Boulder Bolder was once again dominated by Ethiopians from a distinct Y DNA haplogroup. Saying this is not social darwinism.

    Now the next step – intelligence… could there be a statistically significant disparity in AVERAGE population intelligence among DNA halpogroups (not “races”)?

    If that is possible, why the horror? No one is proposing sterilization, camps, or some Huxley-like castes.

  2. wisco’s avatar

    Miguel,
    No righteous wrath, but…

    1) There’s a big difference between physical differences and mental differences. Men and women are very different physically but there is no proof that, for example, men are smarter than women.

    2) I go back to my point that in the absence of the perfect 100/100 experiment, we will likely never have any reliable evidence. So what is the point of starting this fire? It can only lead to strife.

    3) Even if there was evidence of the mental superiority of one group, reliable or not, it might not lead to camps etc but it would give racism a dramatic boost. I don’t think that does anybody any good.

    You’re seeing this as an intellectual & scientific exercise. It’s a political exercise.

  3. Miguel’s avatar

    There may be no “proof” concerning relative, average IQ and gender. But there is long history with SAT and ACT scores that can be adjusted for gender, school district, etc. So what? If women have, on average, a higher verbal SAT – big deal!

    In the abstract, there is very modest benefit in confirming/understanding that Ethiopians (either on average or at the highest quintile) have some physiological long-twitch muscle and/or cardio advantage over say – Uighrs. (Unless understanding the specific genome/halpogroup – performance connection could lead to curing ALS, MS, etc.)

    I’m not saying genetics/intelligence is an important line of inquiry, but I could imagine circumstances where it could be.

    And while the “disparate imapact” claims are filed annually for every civil service test in the U.S…. it is political, but so was learning that the Earth orbited the Sun (no practical significance in 1630 Italy, but a game changer for the Church).

    My brother scored higher on a validated test to be a fireman, but he’s out because the test is flawed; and we know the test is flawed because an “unflawed test” would deliver a result where the top 10% would mirror the demographic ratio of applicants precisely. Anything else is a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. 1981. THATS POLITICAL!

  4. wisco’s avatar

    There’s a big difference between SAT/ACT scores and saying some ethnic group is innately, genetically inferior. I can’t think of anything good that could come out of proving that is the case but I can think of lots of bad things that would.

    Were we in employment law together? I agree with you there are some ridiculous cases in that area as judges try to find a way to fashion the law to support their desires. (Isn’t that what most judges do anyway?) Definitely very political. One thing that always bothered me about those cases is that it seemed like firefighters and police officers were being promoted based on tests. (Tests and affirmative action.) But aren’t there many untestable traits that should be taken into consideration for these promotions? Like leadership ability?

  5. Miguel’s avatar

    But you’ve read Kampfkraft by van Crefeld. (Now I’ve exposed myself) You understand that unpleasant thruths exist. And where there is a single axis “inferirority” there is likely to be some compensating superiority on another axis.

  6. wisco’s avatar

    I’m a big van Creveld fan but I haven’t read that one.

  7. Miguel’s avatar

    You’d know it as Fighting Power: German and US Army performance, 1939-1945. My metaphor is that we live with harsh, non-relativistic comparisons all the time and that maintining collective national/racial esteem is a poor substitute for the truth.

    Im enjoying An Army at Dawn now.

  8. wisco’s avatar

    Yes, I read Fighting Power in college thanks to my advisor who worked at the Hoover Institute and the Naval Postgraduate School. I liked it though there is a school of thought that estimations of WWII German military fighting power have been overblown. (I don’t agree.)

    I go back to my previous arguments:
    1. There is a big difference between saying one ethnicity is, say, on average shorter than another and saying one is on average less intelligent than another.
    2. The truth is unknown, any attempt to know it is pure speculation, and searching for “proof” that one ethnicity is less intelligent than another causes way more harm than any possible good.