I work three jobs. First, I have a full-time day job to pay the bills. Second, writing is my passion and I hope someday it will pay my bills. Being a writer with a day job is like having homework every day of my life but I usually don’t have the time or energy to do the homework. My third job is managing my own health care. Though I get lots of help from others, day-to-day I’m my own primary caregiver. I manage my medicines, appointments, treatments and so forth. It’s hard to find the time and energy to work these three jobs. Not to mention the daily errands and tasks we all have to do to maintain. I’m more chronically ill than usual now so working my three jobs and maintaining is that much harder. For example, a snowstorm swept through town a few weeks ago and dropped ten inches. I spent nearly all my energy for two days shoveling the walks.

Thus I have limited energy available each day and I hate to waste it dealing with incompetent people and incompetent systems. How much energy do we as a country waste on incompetent people and systems? A lot. Too much. As manager of my own health care, I’ve spent a good portion of my life dealing with incompetence in medical billing, whether with hospital billing departments or the billing departments of private companies. It’s been a stark contrast to the excellent doctors and nurses I’ve always had. It’s a rare joy when you find an oasis of competence in medical billing. Once upon a time I had a guy at my hospital billing department I could call and ask for a list of my outstanding bills and he would mail it to me. (Funny that his ability to fulfill this basic customer need is noteworthy.)

Let’s be clear. Medical billing is a nightmare for everyone involved. I miss my old pal at the University Hospital billing department but he must have realized he’d booked passage on the Titanic and jumped ship. It could be that no bright business school graduates want to get into medical billing and who could blame them? Because even when it’s competent it’s incomprehensible. So by competent I mean you get a bill that resembles something close to reasonable. It’s a low threshold you would never tolerate from any other business you deal with, except perhaps car repair shops. But you must tolerate it in medical billing and car repair or you’ll go mad. “You say the left wizonator gasket needs replacing? And there are hours of labor just to get to it in the middle of the engine? Um, okay.” Unless you want to enroll in automotive repair school or spend two weeks at the hospital auditing your account, you have to accept what you’re told. With your car repair guy there is hopefully some trust. With medical billing there is just resignation.

DO NOT BELIEVE ANYONE when they say private companies are more competent and more efficient than government. Some are (Amazon.com) and some aren’t (most others) but believe me, no government-run health care system could do worse when it comes to medical billing. When people mention a single payer health system, someone always invokes fear of mismanagement. Well, I can tell you from a lifetime of experience, there is plenty of incompetence on the business side with private health care insurers and providers.

Mail-Order Pharmacy Blues

One of the benefits of my job that pays the bills is that I have excellent health care coverage, for which I am very grateful. If you factor in my health care (and when you have a chronic illness you MUST factor in your health care), I’m making a GREAT salary. But dealing with my insurance company’s official pharmacy is a huge pain in the ass.

As a CF & lung transplant patient I take many medicines (each day, 46 pills/inhalers/injectables with 19 names). So I spend a lot of time managing my pill supply: filling pill containers, ordering refills, pursuing prescription renewals. For most of my meds, I order from my insurance company’s approved mail-order pharmacy. At first glance, there is a significant time & money advantage to ordering three month supplies from a mail-order pharmacy instead of getting monthly refills from my local King Soopers pharmacy. But given my mail-order pharmacy’s incompetence, I have to wonder.

Time needed to order medicine from my local King Soopers pharmacy: one 30 second automated phone call and 1-2 days wait for the medicine to be ready for pickup.

Time needed to order medicine from my mail-order pharmacy: one to three 10 minute phone calls and 1-2 weeks wait for medicine to arrive in mail.

My insurance company is United Healthcare (“UC”) and their official mail-order pharmacy is Prescription Solutions (“PS”). The latter should change their name to Prescription Solutions After Much Asshattery.

PS has a website where you can order your medicines. You add medicines to your “cart” and go through the usual drill. The website is slow, medicines appear and disappear, but overall it works — or at least places an order. However, certain medicines can only be purchased by calling the Prescription Solutions Specialty Pharmacy (“PSSP”). In my case, these are the heavy-hitter immuno-suppressant medicines Prograf and Rapamune. “Specialty Drugs” is the industry euphemism for “expensive.” And UC does not allow me to order three month supplies of this drug. I must order them on a monthly basis. To be fair, these are expensive drugs and the prescribed dosages can change so I understand why they’ve created this special class. For these drugs, I’m not allowed to go to my local King Soopers pharmacy. I must call the PSSP. This is inconvenient but I could live with it if it was as “fast and easy” as the PSSP claims. “Protracted and difficult” would be a more accurate motto.

As a funny aside, the specialty drugs ARE listed on the PS website. You CAN add them to your cart and submit an order for them. But you will never get them. And they will never call you to tell you you’re not getting them. Imagine if Amazon worked that way. You find a book you want to order on Amazon, add it to your cart, submit the order — and you never get the book or hear from them again. Then you call up Amazon and they say, “Oh, you can’t order that book online. You have to call a special number.” One person I spoke with at PS told me, “They are aware of the problem.”

What is it like to call the PSSP? First there is your time on hold. You hear a woman’s voice, “Thank you for holding, a pharmacy team member will be with you shortly.” Then the Mozart starts. Ah, wonderful, I bet you can hear the entire Mozart catalog if you’re stuck on hold for too long! Nope. You hear the same one minute of Eine Kleine Nachtmusik on a loop. And every thirty seconds the woman’s voice pops up again, “Thank you for holding, a pharmacy team member will be with you shortly.” When you’ve spent as much time on hold as I have, you get to map this all out.

Finally, someone picks up. They ask for your birth date (the hottest trend in health care is using people’s birth dates as identifiers), name, address, city, zip code and phone number. Then they ask why you’re calling.

Then they ask you three questions:

1. Do you ever forget to take your medicine?
2. Because of feeling better, have you ever stopped taking the medicine?
3. Because of feeling worse, have you ever stopped taking the medicine?

Aside from being patronizing, this is annoying. How about leaving the practice of medicine to my doctors? But hey, while you’re at it, why not rephrase the same question in another ten ways, dickheads? This is the procedure I have to go through EVERY MONTH to get medicine I have now been taking for 15 years. Imagine if the clerk at the grocery store quizzed you about your dairy consumption every time you arrived at checkout with a gallon of milk.

I can count on some sort of fiasco 80% of the time I order from either PS or PSSP. Usually, it’s because the order is “not going through” which means for whatever reason it didn’t process correctly and insurance was not applied. Remember, UC and PS are supposedly business partners yet the communication between them has a 50% failure rate. It always takes a series of phone calls to reach the end result, my monthly order of the same medicines at roughly the same price. (It’s a measure of the lunacy of medical billing that I don’t even care if the prices are consistent any more. If they’re close that’s all you can realistically hope for. It’s so exasperating you are willing to pay an Incompetence Tax.) They have an interesting standard operating procedure: if they cannot fill the order for you, they prefer to keep that information to themselves. THEY DO NOT TELL YOU WHEN YOUR ORDER IS ON HOLD! You have to keep checking to see if the order has been filled or if there is a hitch, which there usually is.

I’ll illustrate the above with one month’s PSSP fiasco.

Call #1: Woman. Mozart. Woman. Mozart. After a while, I get a person. Identifying gauntlet. Order medicine. Telephonic medical exam gauntlet. And I’m told the price for my order is around $700. “That is not correct,” I say. She’s going to send it to another department where computer circuits are massaged. I say, if the massage fails and the price doesn’t go back to the price I paid last month, call me.

They call me back, leave a message and ask me to call them.

Call #2: Ten minutes later, I call them back. Woman, Mozart, woman, Mozart, etc etc. After a while, I get a person. Before the identifying gauntlet, we have this conversation:

Me: “I’m calling you guys back.”
Her: “Did you already order for this month?”
Me: “Yes.”
Her: “Disregard the call.”
Me: “But someone just called me ten minutes ago and said to call back.”
Her: “You can disregard the call.”
Me: “I think you should check to make sure.”
Her: *sigh*

Then we go through the identifying gauntlet. Furious tapping of keys, airport check-in style. Then she says she’s going to put me on hold. I hear no Mozart. I hear dead air. After five minutes of purgatory, I give up and hang up. They don’t call me back.

Call #3: A day or two later I called back. Mozart. Identifying gauntlet. I speak to someone, who explains the high cost of my order this month (why it’s different than every other month). With the start of the new year, my deductible started up again. Never mind that this call is happening in March and I have ordered other medicines already in both calendar and fiscal year 2012. Also, I say, “I’m in state government. Our plan does not run on a calendar year.” Later I realize a third logical flaw with this explanation — through some kind of database magic, my deductible is (allegedly) being charged for the Prograf but not the Rapamune. “You need to talk to your insurance company,” I’m told. I hang up, ready to strangle somebody.

Then comes a whole new Circle of Incompetence. I go to the insurance company website. They have no phone number to call them about pharmacy orders (or anything), instead referring me to the Prescription Solutions website. I email Prescription Solutions. I explain the whole situation. The response email tells me to call the Prescription Solutions Specialty Pharmacy. Back where I started.

Call #4: I’m on hold for over ten minutes. Mozart, woman, Mozart, woman, etc etc. I’m ready to dance on Mozart’s grave. I get a person. I explain the situation. “Oh, no problem.” After a three minute conversation, they fix the problem (which it turns out was — I hope you’re sitting down — PSSP incompetence). They then mail me my prescription at the same price I pay every month.

All that to order two medicines I take every month. It’s Russian roulette with every call and every order but instead of one bullet in the six-shooter there are five. Normally you place an order and forget about it but with PS you can’t forget. It’s a task you cannot cross of your “to do” list. Until you see the order has shipped anything can happen. Will they ship it or won’t they? You assume when you order something it’s going to ship or you’ll hear from the company. Most businesses would go bankrupt if they were so unreliable. Is it because PS has a monopoly? They are my only mail-order pharmacy and my option for two critical drugs. Monopolies tend to have horrible customer service (think about your cable company).

Incompetent people and incompetent systems. Extra phone calls, extra time, extra energy to straighten out what should not have been bent. And it’s not just extra time and effort for me. It also becomes extra time and effort for my transplant nurse coordinators and others, who I have to call for help when my mail-order pharmacy fails me. That is the Incompetence Ripple Effect throughout the economy. And, finally, it’s more work for PSSP itself because I can only imagine these errors magnify into a thousand annoyed patients calling them over and over.

More experiences with PS & PSSP:

1. My doctors changed my Prograf usage. Prograf prevents my body from rejecting my donated lungs — very important. My transplant nurse called in my new prescription on 3/14/12. I was away from my office for three days and thought it would be waiting for me when I got back. I finally called on 3/20/12 and they told me the order was, of course, “on hold.” I realized this by checking the order status online. I called. It turns out it was on hold because my nurse had asked for a 90 day prescription and PSSP does not allow this. Did they call my nurse? No. Did they call me? No. The order would have been on hold forever, I guess. They told me they would send the order to their Data Entry Department to correct the prescription down to 30 days. And asked me to call back in two hours to place the order again. Do I need to call them every day to make sure nothing has tripped up my orders? I find this happens a lot on the business side of health care. Instead of the entity monitoring and fixing its own systems, they expect their customers to monitor and fix their systems.

2. On 6/5/12, I order a long list of medicine online. According to what I see online, everything seems fine. But I should have learned by now things with PS are rarely fine. On 6/11/12, I call and ask what happened to my order. Turns out it is…on hold. Why? Because they have one medicine listed twice in the order with my current dosage and older dosage. I don’t think this was my error but maybe it was. Again, why didn’t PS notify me my order was on hold? Instead of just placing the order on hold, why isn’t someone troubleshooting it? Great online ordering system! So I call up and speak to a guy named Gary. He is extremely competent and resolves the issue quickly. Total call time: six minutes. I wish I could speak to Gary every time I call. Maybe they need to change to a caseworker system, i.e., assign each patient to a representative. Or maybe they could put Gary onto a full-time troubleshooting detail that checks and fixes every order that is on hold. Maybe they don’t tell us our orders are on hold because they know they’re on hold for bullshit reasons and just need a second look? So the problem is they are slow with the second looks?

3. In their defense, hold time on calls has gone down drastically and they have discontinued the annoying monthly medical quiz.

4. February 2013. I order a medicine from PS I need by the end of the week. I order two day shipping. Two days later, it still has not shipped. The website says it takes 24-48 hours to process an order. I call and the representative (“Customer Service Advocate” they call them) tells me it really takes up to seven days to process an order. So I pay for two day shipping but that really means two days plus up to seven days? Awesome. I thought I had this particular fiasco worked out but then found out one of the medicines was not covered by insurance (according to PS — even though it has been covered for years). They told me to call UC. I did and UC said it was covered and that PS should have called them. In the end, covered. But because of PS incompetence I had to order it from King Soopers. If I could order 3-month supplies from King Soopers (why can’t I?), I would give up on PS.

Back around the time of my first transplant, toward the end of law school and the beginning of my post-law life, I spent a few years working on a novel that centered around the Iranian Hostage Crisis. I read many many books on Iran and US-Iran relations and the 1970s and Jimmy Carter and the Hostage Crisis. I feel like I know a lot about the subject. And I still hope to write that novel one day so I’m not going to reveal too much about it but I can say it proved to be too ambitious for me at that time.

I still tinker with the idea and given all the energy I’ve put into my Iran novel over the years, I was eager to see Argo. I wanted to like it and I did in some ways but was disappointed in others.

What I think Affleck did well:

1. As illustrated by the photos at the end of the movie, Affleck obviously took great care to be accurate in some respects. The U.S. Embassy compound in the film looked to be meticulously modeled after the real compound. And the actors playing the various characters looked very similar to the real people. This was distracting in the case of one mustache in particular. How accurate is too accurate? At what point do hair & clothing styles become mockeries of themselves despite being completely accurate? Should a filmmaker subtly dull them to make them palatable to a modern audience? And is it important to have actors who look like the real people, aside from historical figures like Hamilton Jordan perhaps?

2. Along the same lines, I thought Affleck did a good job of portraying some of the events of the hostage crisis, like the mock executions and the reconstruction of classified documents and the portrayal of Sister Mary (the nickname of the Iranian woman who acted as the spokesperson for the hostage-takers). And I think he did an excellent job of the nearly impossible, recreating the day of the takeover.

3. I liked the introduction in which Affleck gave an overview of US-Iranian relations and highlighted the English and American led 1953 coup that overthrew democratically elected Mohammad Mosaddegh and installed the repressive Shah. Where would Iran be today if we had not overthrown Mosaddegh? Where would the Middle East be today if there had been a democratically-inclined Iran since 1951? We executed that coup for what became British Petroleum, which Mosaddegh had nationalized in Iran. As usual, our short-term foreign policy aims had disastrous long-term consequences. Remember that until the recent Arab Spring the conventional wisdom about the Middle East was that democracy would not work there.

4. The scenery of Tehran in the movie was awesome (with mountains very like Colorado’s Front Range) and prominent city sites, like Azadi Square, were fun to see. I assume they were all done with computer graphics (or some other stand-in mountains) since the movie was not filmed in Iran.

Where I think Affleck failed:

1. Overemphasizing the American and CIA role. It’s frustrating that Hollywood continues to believe we are so narrow-minded that everything must be spun to maximize the United States. Jimmy Carter has said the rescue of the Houseguests was 90% Canadian and 10% American. This was a Canadian moment of glory and it’s annoying that we’re trying to hijack it because we are so parochial. That’s not a good way to thank our good and brave neighbor.

2. The ridiculous chase scene at the end. Is this a realistic thriller or a caper movie? This goes to a deeper issue Hollywood encounters with all historical fiction and really all fact-based stories. There is a false assumption that Hollywood must embellish truth to make it interesting and/or entertaining. Not true. History supplies plenty of intrigue. But effort must be exerted to portray it. The problem is with lazy screenwriters and directors who fail to create the tension needed without wacky Revolutionary Guard chase scenes on the tarmac. There was plenty of danger in Tehran during the Islamic Revolution. Affleck did not do a good job of corralling it. He had moments, like the hanging man. But he needed more than the occasional hanging man or burning truck. People were getting taken outside and shot for little reason every day. There were roving mobs of revolutionary thugs. It was anarchy. There was talk of all this in the movie and even some images but we needed to feel it. We needed at least one extended scene where one of the characters saw this all happening.

3. As I said above, Affleck faced a nearly impossible task in attempting to recreate the drama and feel of the Iranian Islamic Revolution. But people have pulled have such feats. The best movie I can think of along these lines was Missing with Jack Lemmon. Lemmon plays the father of an American journalist who has disappeared in the Chilean coup of 1973. And as we follow Lemmon around Chile as he traces the last days of his son’s life we feel the danger of the times. That movie was drenched in what was missing, the rule of law. There was a grit and danger in Missing that Affleck failed to match in his Tehran. The one exception was that moment in the bazaar with all the yelling. Affleck can do gritty, like the neighborhood in Gone Baby Gone. But he wasn’t able to do it in Argo.

To be fair, the Islamic Revolution and the Iranian Hostage Crisis are complicated subjects that cannot easily be portrayed in a two hour movie. Add in the fact that Iran is a unique culture in world history. In a way, Affleck tried to do too much. He did try to mention everything. And I think he was not quite sure what kind of movie he wanted. Was it a Soderbergh farce like The Informant? Or was it a serious drama like Missing? It tried to be both as it switched back and forth between Hollywood and Tehran. The tone of the film was inconsistent and the shifts were jarring.

The Iranian Hostage Crisis is full of great stories. I’m sure more movies will be made about it and Argo, despite its flaws, is the gold standard for now. I tip my cap to Affleck for taking on a monumental task and nearly pulling it off.

I think this is true of writing too. You never know what in your work will resonate with people. You have to write what feels true to you (meaning what you are passionate about), send it out into the world, and not worry about the reaction. The reaction belongs to the readers.

When I tell a story—when I do anything onstage—it sounds crazy, but I don’t concern myself with the reaction. Because every listener is different, so they’re going to pull something different out of the story. I think a lot of times performers, and storytellers in particular, make the mistake of trying to manipulate their audience’s emotions or reactions. But I think when you tell the story, you tell the truth as much as you can, and it’s up to them what they take away from it.
–Peter Aguero, master storyteller for The Moth

As far as I know, he’s no relation to Sergio Aguero. (A wee bit of English Premier League humor.)

Another great quote from an interview with him you can read here:

Well, your stories are, at a base level, about an emotional truth, and the more I tell stories and hear people’s stories, the more I realize we’re all the same. We think we’re these complicated animals, these special, unique flowers, and we are to a certain extent, but we also all know what it’s like to feel joy, to feel hate, to feel anger, to be sad, to be scared—we all know that. So you tell your story as much as you can at the base emotional truth, and then the two hundred people in the audience are reminded of two hundred stories of when they felt anger, or fear, or utter joy, you know? And that’s why, I think, I tell stories. It’s an amazing exchange of energy, a nonverbal communication that happens…

« Older entries